InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 3111
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/03/2005

Re: nwtf post# 360471

Wednesday, 04/17/2024 10:58:15 AM

Wednesday, April 17, 2024 10:58:15 AM

Post# of 360669
This is what I was referring to:

markgovols Wednesday, 03/03/10 10:01:49 AM
Re: badog post# 202551 0
Post # of 347877
It's NOT insider info. ANYONE can obtain it. It's called research and hard work. I made contacts at the JDA. I've made contacts at Platts, Dow Jones News, Wallstreet Journal, RigZone, Upstream, Large ERHE Shareholders, STP Oil Minister, and AUNT Jemima. Inside information would be if I was calling Peter Ntephe and getting info. Anyone can call the JDA. It's a govt agency basically. I cannot help it that the number on the website is not working. I guarantee I could find a new one on my own. Do some research. Put forth some effort. I am not going to post my contact's cell phone number. You want me to wipe your azz too? Some of you people amaze me. Some of you spend so much time whining and criticizing those who post info because you want more info. You want to know the exact month, day, time, second, what color and letterhead will be on the PR and if the person writing the PR has more than one tie. Gimme a break. You could use all this wasted time emailing and calling contacts (Media, JDA, etc...). It's not hard. I'm not that smart but I have some drive to succeed and that's really all that's needed. Get together with Puffthemagicwhiner and get us an ****UPDATE*****! In the meantime pass the syrup.




badog Wednesday, 03/03/10 12:01:13 PM
Re: markgovols post# 202571 0
Post # of 347877
Mark,

Pretty scathing post. Problem is...I never asked you for a phone number to the JDA. Get your responses straight!

Second...don't understand your Aunt Jemima reference. Makes no sense.

Third... I wasn't going to go here but you called me out...

Posted by: markgovols Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Here ya go:
From Source (A) who's company was a contractor on the rig. They had assisted in the analysis of the data and he said that from what he saw the amount of oil and condensate was very encouraging. He was unable to discuss volumetrics but would be "gobsmacked if block 4 didn't produce large amounts of liquids for many years".

Now from not so Secret Source...Badog...............

Well Well Well. Call me gobsmacked. I have one little issue with above secret 'Souce A' and his description of the data analysis...Is your 'Source A' verifiable? And one more very important point... Before a contractor is allowed on site...and probably in thier yearly, monthly, weekly training I would have to guess that they are instructed to never...I mean never...give out information regarding a customers drilling information. I mean never. If I were Sinopec I would not let anyone have access to data without a non-disclosure agreement. I would guess that this is equal to insider information and I would guess you get jail time for this...and risk never drilling for a customer again...and ruin many reputations. This is probably one of the most serious offenses a contractor can make. The price they charge to drill these wells is ungodly. What if one employee ruins your multi-billion business by giving out this info? I would guess that the Secret Source probably could go to jail. The Company is broke. All for nothing. I mean what did the Secret Souce gain? Nada. And to give this info just because you got his number (if any of this source info is true to begin with) and called ...and asked. And for nothing? Would you risk your career...not seeing your family, the humiliation, being broke, and maybe being a Convict? Even giving info like this to a family member would be extremely risky? To give it to someone you don't know personally?...Kiss your life goodbuy.

If you can get people on this board to believe this...more power to you. But I'm not part of the group.

I've got more it you what it. Again...don't come after me if you don't want a response!

Continue on with your spring cleaning.

Badog

From <https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=47332016>;

There were many who cheered for this unverifiable and probably non-existant Source A. They wanted to hear this crap in hopes it would help the sp. I was the goat for calling him and his so-called info out.

There are those today that want to believe in ghost shorters in hopes that it's true...that scenario would help the sp. Problem is that they cannot come up with anything solid. Just short squeeze theories. If ERHC would ever get positive news about it's interest in the EEZ the sp will go up....some. That's the best possible outcome that I could envision here.

Badog