InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 6722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: DaJester post# 791359

Wednesday, 04/17/2024 10:55:01 AM

Wednesday, April 17, 2024 10:55:01 AM

Post# of 794622

Right, why would they possibly want any of the capital taken from the GSEs over the past 15 years to do anything useful. Like say, ummm. Pay off the SPS - Shares that can't be legally paid down.



What I meant by "what need do they have for capital beyond the regulatory requirements" was to look at that from the perspective of the government as financial regulator, not from the perspective of the companies.

The very purpose of FnF having sufficient capital, as defined by law and regulation, is to prevent them from being a danger to the financial system. This is true of other financial institutions as well. From the government's point of view, if FnF have enough capital, where "enough" is defined by law and regulation, what purpose would there be for the companies to have more?

I think that's the justification for the past-full-capitalization cash sweep.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.

Posting about other posters is the last refuge of the incompetent.