NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

SilviaJ
2:26 AM

$NLST I went back and re-read (again and again) the oral arguments for claim 16 of the 912 patent. This is what I took from the back and forth.

The Ellsberry prior art discussion mostly revolves around priority dates. NLST asserts that the 912 is a continuation of the 436, which is a continuation of the 386, which is a continuation of the 244, which has priority over Ellsberry (which is true). But, Samsung argues that the 436 did not discuss claim 16 art.

But Dr Zhong indicated that the 386 (prior to the 436) has claim 16 art which doesn't need to be repeated in all "continuation" art. In addition, Samsung never raised the PLL issue in petition (only in the reply)........which is not allowed.

So, Anita Zhong was quick to dismiss Ellsberry and went on to more important arguments. She seems pretty confident that Ellsberry is a non-issue and focuses on Perego.

full thread...... https://stocktwits.com/SilviaJ/message/569690757