much love, my dearest LAR LAR...........the action you referenced is a court recognized "related case" and cited in sonterra v. barclays (our case)................but I don't believe the FDIC as Receiver has any skin in that game.........?????.................the settlement in your case will weigh upon our case, so there is a connection.....
sonterra v. barclays....with UBS remaining as the lone member of the defendant class, subject to the appeal which is pending at USCA/2...............
dunno what to think, LAR LAR, at this point.......same old, same old.............pain and agony waiting and not knowing anything other than SPECULATION.........
we ain't dead, LAR LAR.................and we know we have about $10.50 per, on account, with $5-per, accruing nice interest.............
appears your i-HUB wife, BALTIMORE BOB, is bogarting the weed vape tool....again.....aimho....
