Seems you don't understand Xeriant's lawsuit demands that XTI Aircraft pay the $6M Auctus loan Note.
I just addressed and answered your ad nauseam again repeated demand, now again made in reply to my previous post that addressed and answered your ad nauseam again repeated demand (round n round): To Xeriant not demanding their $5.4M and/or XTI Aircraft shares, I told you already...:
Xeriant via its lawsuit is demanding XTI Aircraft to pay Xeriant's $6.05M loan Note from Auctus, so Xeriant does not want any XTI Aircraft shares or $5,4M liability satisfying payment (yet). Xeriant is working to get it's equivalent valuation of owed XTI shares or its XTI-owed $5.4 in another manner: by seeking court order for XTI to pay Xeriant's $6.05M Auctus Note, if not its multiple Note default penalties too.
Correct, Xeriant's Complaint has not directly sought XTI shares or $5,4M payment from XTI Aircraft.
Even if no shares are distributed to Xeriant by and from XTI Aircraft, you do understand XTI Aircraft has stated in multiple of its SEC financial statements (Inpixon having done the exact same) that XTI Aircraft is liable to Xeriant in the amount of $5.4M. You understand and agree right? Fact, right? XTI Aircraft stated so, correct? .... .... crickets..... ..... crickets.....
And if $5.4M is not paid to Xeriant (money or equivalent value shares) as you claim will never occur then we'll see this fraud further splayed for all to consider. But the lawsuit forcing XTI Aircraft to pay the Auctus Note appears to be Xeriant's current angle.
.
