Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Either way, I still think that positive ipr outcomes for the patent owner do not add any more validity that the day the patent was born. Remember, any and all possible challenges should theoretically already been looked into by the examiner if he did his job fully. Each and every one of any possible challenges, should already be addressed in the patent itself because a challenger would presumably have to choose some attribute of the patent already written in to the patent.
Bottom line: as far as I'm concerned, unless and until someone can show me where a judge has ruled positive on an ipr challenge, in favor of the patent owner, based even partially on the fact of such "wins", then I maintain they add zero.

That said, it occurs to me that in the case of a jury decision, a jury presumably could vote however they want, regardless of case law or precedent......except I don't think ptab trials ever use a jury. I think they use one of those "corrupt" 3 judge tribunal panels, you know, likd the 3 seperate panels it took over a years for them to get the balls to finally come up with their ruling.....which, hahaha.....was the DIRECT RESULT OF THE WARNING BY TOM SAWYER THAT THEY BEST DO THE RIGHT THING OR FACE FEDERAL RICO CHARGES.