Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

Begs to differ WHAT? Your 1 liner shows that you don't understand the legal nature of a positive ipr outcome. It is not a win of anything. It is simply the successful defense against someone's challenge to validity. And validity, as I have explained many times does NOT equate that a patent can actually do what it claims.......plus, as I just pointed out in previous post, the USPTO who is the agency that provides the validation of a patent, does not automatically require proof of that be provided nor is source code provided to them. There is the clear proof of my statements. Perhaps you need to delve somewhat deeper before making such a sweeping but shallow 1 line determination, as opposed to a set of circumstances that show the logic of a determination. Also, as of a few years ago, at the least (but the question may have been answered by now..), judges and courts have never decided whether or not positive ipr outcomes for a patent owner, is anything that sways a court one way or the other. In other words, unless you can show me where the court system and judges accept such ipr outcomes as evidence that it has any bearing on the question of infringement.