InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 68
Posts 2676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/27/2020

Re: dcspka post# 93973

Thursday, 04/04/2024 3:48:05 PM

Thursday, April 04, 2024 3:48:05 PM

Post# of 94137
The two of you cleary don't understand the inference of the CE and impact on the business operations with the indicators of fraud implied.
This would interfere with operations as well as aquistions. I've explained this 1,000 times but the two of you seem to have selective memory. But that's OK.
All of that is and will be changing soon as the official audit supercedes the Caveat Emptor Designation by the OTCM because it gives no reason that a potential acquisition candidate can do due dillegence to find liability. Thus they have to default to worse case,which is fraud. With the Audit now officially done, those barriers are now removed the OTCM CE becomes null and void outside of the OTCM as It pertains to business operations.
But, as I said a year ago the OTCM better have a damn good reason for the CE because fully certified Audit found none. Whose gonna be responsible for that?