InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 122
Posts 5289
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/27/2005

Re: wrongjoe post# 30075

Tuesday, 02/27/2007 1:16:35 AM

Tuesday, February 27, 2007 1:16:35 AM

Post# of 115222
*Actually, RE: Dividend...Company-Has-Met-the PR'd date..

...In looking closer the Headline Reads as Follows:

Aurus Announces Extension Regarding Date of Record of Dividend

...And then it says clearly that:

..."in future releases the Company shall provide shareholders with information as to the procedure to issue the stock dividend".

...So all considered then, The 'RECORD Date' has been met. And Now we only wait then 'PROCEDURE'.

...This PR was updated in the I-Box tonight, Perhaps we all assumed something was missed when in fact the Record Date came and was met.

*Updated: The prior delay was PR'd...This 'Record Date' was not PR'd to have ANY Delays...So then considering the prior 'notce' and then the absense of any such 'delay notice' for the new 'Record Date'...I see no reason to assume THAT is not in fact the firm date...and has been met.


..."Together we learn -- Together we earn"...
2create