InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 34
Posts 640
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2013

Re: DaJester post# 790893

Wednesday, 04/03/2024 9:43:08 AM

Wednesday, April 03, 2024 9:43:08 AM

Post# of 793121
Dajester,

Kt is not serious and has an agenda to perpetuate a narrative that transfers as much wealth from retail investors to institutions. Notice that if you refer to his original post asking those questions that I have provided specific answers to his questions to that post and provided over the past 2 years a novel strategy that could nullify the SPSPA. Any shareholder can do this. I originally proposed that multiple shareholders file these lawsuits in their district courts all across the nation as a form of lawfare. I no longer advocate for that due to the weaponization of the DOJ and the regime gestapo.

The jury verdict is a finding of fact that the federal governments agreement with itself violates the common law contract rights of shareholders. You cant separate the NWS from the rest of the agreement because of the structure and wording of the agreement itself. The agreement is not a valid contract. I argued that the Supreme Court could have ended the argument when they ruled the FHFA director was under the direct supervision of POTUS. But they didnt. The finding of fact by the jury cant be appealed. Only the court processes can. The only logical way out now is to claim a political victory terminating the SPSPA claiming to have saved the housing finance system while protecting the taxpayers. Should nothing happen and a change in gov occur that reigns in the justice department then there will still be a couple years to challenge the SPSPA as I propose. The 8-0 finding of fact will be the argument that judges will not be able argue away and dismiss.