"This thread started with my statement that the "big boys" steal IP. Your reply was that meant I said "...every single voip service provider out there, small, medium and large are all thieves" which is obviously not true at all. But you then proceed to launch an attack for me saying so."
________________________
You're either tremendously confused, lack comprehension or just habitually twist people's words/meanings. And you consistently do so in ea post. That's not an attack, it's a fact...
The only correct thing you said was about the thread starting with YOU SAYING THAT THE BIG DOGS STEAL THE IP. So I asked you the legitimate question of where do they steal it from. Then YOU VERY CONVENIENTLY left out your silly reply that they steal it from the owners, preceded by your "duh" remark designed to say my question was dumb. It was not, but you are too myopic to realize that. It was a part for the course reply as I was clearly asking WHERE/HOW they get it from. Obviously if originates with the owners or they wouldn't be the owner, now would they. A more intelligent view of the quality estion wants to know how the big dogs go about the steal, which is not obvious like your "from the owners of the IP". It's ironic that you try to make intelligent questions and/or commentary, look dumb. Really ironic... I guess that's why you just left your less than intelligent reply out, in your current post...
So I followed from your answer that the big dogs steal it, that you were therefore saying that it's all they do is steal IP. All of them. That is consistent with you stating that the big dogs steal the IP. Simple.. Now you say it's obvious that you didn't say that.....BUT IT'S RIGHT THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE! You clearly said they steal it from the owners. Now you deny saying it, lolol.
You go on to say that the rest of my post was an attack on you. Lol, where you derive such ridiculousness is beyond understanding. In no way was the rest of my post an attack on you. The rest of my post, as I recall, was me delineating the the implications and the fallacious outcomes, that would be evident if the voip service providers indeed did steal the IP and then spend many years infringing. They were logical and sensible well thought out scenarios designed to show the falsity of that claim you made about the big dogs, NOT, AS YOU SAY, AN ATTACK ON YOU. The attack, from a discerning mind, was against the idea or theory that the companies stole from Vplm and have been infringing ever since, which happens to make zero sense, as I clearly spelled out. Attack on you??? Not surprising, I suppose, that you feel such paranoia, if that's your regular way of seeing things. Maybe you don't know what attack means? Who knows what insanity lurks in the minds of ofc msg board peeps?
Let me go look if the silliness stopped there....
Oh wait, 1st, for clarity, I should add that long ago the emu categorically stated that ALL voip service providers were infringing, a wholly ridiculous statement, nevertheless he said it and that validates my saying that "they all steal the IP", which, lol, you seemed to have a problem with even though you say THE big dogs steal the IP from the owner. And, yes, I did hear emu say it. I made perfect sense. I've had 13 yrs or so to perfect these perceptions of mine.
Ok, now back to the rest of your fantasies...
You go on to say everything I say denotes sadness. That is yet one more of your lack of ability to evaluate or assess one's mental state or attitude. Waaay off the mark. I am not a sad person in general, period. You're batting 1000 on missing the mark. Oh, but wait, you then correct yourself and say that sadness was the wrong word and so then you fake psychology by saying it's actually pathetic that I am. You attempt to qualify that by saying I make up facts and it makes me pathetic. I do not make up facts. I always separate what I consider to be facts, from my opinions or theories, conjecture etc. Perhaps you should list the facts I presented that you see, as making me sad and or pathetic. Sounds more to me like a loser who lacks credible points so in lieu, uses negative name calling. THAT.....is what I would call TRULY pathetic, because there is no semblance of you supporting or backing up your claims. That the path you made path-etic. Incidentally, I'm a student of psychology. Suggesting I need a psychologist is the VERY DEFINITION OF GASLIGHTING you are using which reveals who might benefit from some "office visits" because your failure to understand and or take things more accurately, most likely presents you with regular problems. Friendly advice is all.
I think you went on with more of the same drivel but enough us enough. I suggest you end it here as you're so far off base, no way you'll reach home so I'm dropping it here. No point in continuing. If you choose to continue, I'll just do iggy.
Have another day
All my commentary is to be considered as my personal opinions, to which I am entitled. And there is no proof of said opinions unless I offer it in the comments.
