InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 273
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2005

Re: chazzy1 post# 18272

Sunday, 03/31/2024 1:23:55 PM

Sunday, March 31, 2024 1:23:55 PM

Post# of 18304
Yes indeed sir Charles. This is the opposite of cut and dry. Until we can “solve for X,” with the information available, there is more information to come.

There seems to be two explanations for X. One, is the sudden surprise of no damages at the end of discovery; a legal process incorporated to safeguard against such a surprise. If true, IMHO, it would be an inconceivable legal blunder (given this safeguard).

The other solution to X is Bill Quirk’s Human Factor premis: The family surrendered a large settlement due to grief’s inertia. LocWolf implied the same idea when suggesting Colleen wants nothing to do with this mess. Again, it is inconceivable that both the key shareholders (Colleen included) and key stakeholders (legal team) would concede to such share value destruction. Their share value loss is exponentially larger than ours combined.

I’m with you Charles. Unless someone here can provide a plausible solution for X with the available information, then X lies in what is to come – even if this solution explains a why we settled for a loss, given the 2 million might not even cover legal expenses.

Even the mere mention that this is a scam shows a profound lack of DD, critical thinking skills or honesty.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent HDVY News