And what? Am I supposed to be worried about that? That's the nature of postulating, based upon the reasoning of what is observed.
People are entirely free to think what they will, or to not think about Humanigen, at all, if that's what they want to do. But to me, it's a big deal to suffer the abuse of discretionary authority, by the very government intended to prevent the abuse of their citizens. By all means, that is true in the financial sense, where the SEC routinely ignores illegality by everyone, except for the alleged violations by the principals of the victimized companies.
But in a profoundly worse sense, as I learned here, agencies such as NIAID, the NIH, and the FDA, intentionally abuse their discretionary authority, with full knowledge of the immoral loss of life that would be prevented, were these agencies to discharge their duties faithfully. And, "...every day that goes by (I am right)," about families suffering the needless loss of a loved one.
Our share structure was designed to counteract the naked shorting of our shares, and to severely punish the perpetrators, even in the absence of fiduciary duty by the SEC. This defensive mechanism will result in the recall of Humanigen's loaned shares, or, it may be effected simply by a merger. Regardless, it should not even be a contingency for which management had to plan, and meticulously execute over a period of years. Our management has fought more battles than we'll ever know about, perhaps like in regards to our venture in Wuhan.
I think pieces are continuing to fall into place, which may include Tera-Immune, Novavax, and Sanofi, plus mergers or partnerships, including those based on the PREACH-M and RATiNG trials. Of course I'd like to know WHEN these developments will occur. But I have no reason to waste my time writing posts about how meaningless these developments will be to Humanigen.
