inference........like for ai you train it on historical data and synthetic data...like accelerating the training/learning process to provide more potential what ifs'.. when the autonomous vehicles were involved in fatalities, the nvidia chief said they need more training on historical and synthetic data...
perhaps, crazy or more like how they train pilots for the unimaginable line of events. systems failures, even of duplexed systems.?
a reason to have at least 3 rings of power? wags.
Belichick coaching strategy? no such thing as a failsafe? saw the movie freshman year. scarred the you know what out of me.
expect the unpredictable. inference is more about the likelihood of different scenarios.
eg, why did the wh say almost immediately no terrorism in the boat/bridge emergency? boats is headed to sri lanka which is an embattled part of India, the boat has a fire, there is no tug boat accompanying it so close to the bridge. the boat has to signal the bridge of imminent collision? why no radar/proximity alarms? where is the us coast guard? why didn't the harbor pilots immediately call mayday after/if lost power?
who were the workers on the bridge described by country of origin, but not said what nationality was?
my inferometer was going crazy.............you do not rule out terrorism without at least a good look at what the situation is. losing cars and people into the ocean and trying to rescue them is not knowing anything about the situation. coast guard command in the area needs to be examined asap. all ports and international transit points need to be checked. no further souther border transit of illegals to be allowed. if this or other incidents are determined to be terror related, well, the republicans still have majority in congress.
