Tornado Alley (PROG)

[B402]

They certainly disagreed with the bond...As I said to hawk, they were not ruling on the case, thats for appeal....They lowered the bond, as you say, so he could pay it, presumably to avoid asset loss before that appeal....

So, They did disagreed with the Judge and DA on the bond set and then lowered it...Now trump can pay it and assets won't be siezed

Now it will be on to the appeal

And I also noted you left out of the fact check that higher bonds like trumps have historically been for multinationals and big corps..

So I disagree with your opinion, and disagreeing or not, seems they went against the judge and DA in favor of......As you know, the DA ask the panel not to lower it,,,,,,,Did they or did they not lower it against her wishes?