InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2924
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/25/2020

Re: chessmaster315 post# 789971

Monday, 03/25/2024 8:24:27 AM

Monday, March 25, 2024 8:24:27 AM

Post# of 794479
You have stripped out the first explanation as to why the Class Action was illegal and also that the grounds of my take is the Rule 23 for Class Actions:

The share class $FNMA was excluded from the Class Action and that makes it illegal, because one of the prerequisites for Class Actions is that it puts an end to the controversy.
Breach of Rule 23(b)(3):
A class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.



You only have posted the second reason that doesn't comply with this Rule: the NWS 2.0 wasn't challenged.

And you accuse me of snake salesman, Mr. Pro Se?

You remind me of judge Sweeney, who stripped out "authorized by this section" in "take any action authorized by this section" (FHFA-C's Incidental Power).

The Tipp-Ex Gang.