InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 511
Posts 59425
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 12/21/2009

Re: RC62 post# 73790

Sunday, 03/24/2024 7:13:55 PM

Sunday, March 24, 2024 7:13:55 PM

Post# of 75106
I never said Team SFRX consulted with any……

experts, which is likely the main reason they haven’t located or ID a treasure wreck since inception.

Can you please give us the names on Team SFRX? Alphabetical order would be great and would you also tell us which experts that they consulted with



Here’s my order. Take it or leave it.

Kyle, the BOD, Reynolds, The Baer and other archaeologists, the crew, and the 5000 plus shareholders and that includes the angel investors. The whole Fam Damily.

The Baer wrote a White Paper on Melbourne, and it was a stretch for him to tie the artifacts found there to the Concepcion. He’s probably the most qualified among the bunch, but he should have pointed out that their sites lack the presence of cannons and aren’t very promising. Perhaps he did.

And that’s being generous to The Baer as he has been told by the FBAR that the Concepcion has Sovereign Immunity protections, as do other wrecks from the 1715 Fleet.

To put it another way, R 21 has probably forgotten more about salvage than Team SFRX has ever learned.

Feel free to ask another way, or ask for a list of questions to be answered, or whatever.

Kyle said in Nov 2020 that SFRX has been a failure because they haven’t found treasure. Asking questions 17 different ways isn’t going to change that.

Nothing has changed until it hasn’t. Where’s the silver and gold?

To have “game changing technology” and ZERO results means either the tech doesn’t work or the ones using it are clueless.

In closing, thanks to great contributors like you and others, this is the model stock message board on Ihub, in my opinion.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SFRX News