Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[RC62]

Sir Hedge used or tried to use a study that proved his point. I read the study. You conveniently left out that It’s twenty years old, it was done by a single person who had to operate the entire system and the boat both, they didn’t examine any targets, they left out any targets that were below six nanotesla.

@. copied and pasted from study @

“”At a sensor to target distance of 2 to 3 meters there will need to be at least 1-2 kilograms of iron. This can produce a 1-2 nT anomaly that is detectable in a magnetically clean environment.””

“”Upon final completion of data acquisition, anomalies equaling six nanotesla (nT) or more were flagged, plotted and individually cataloged. The number of anomalies cataloged as a result of this process totaled 1,370.””

((So, from what I’ve read, this study was done, twenty years ago, its better to have at least two people doing the survey, the technology is old, they tossed out targets below six nanotesla that the old technology found, …. Yet, sir hedge used the study to prove his claim. Amazing. When challenged, he ignores his facts and twists his logic to make a predictable conclusion.

Can you tell us what the weight of the targets that were, say , five nanotesla?