United Health Products Inc (UEEC)

[shoondale]

DR5...try not spamming the internet with regurgitated bullshit from 2017
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=12414685&guid=4td-kaJ6H_M4B3h#UEEC_EX991_HTM
Change a few words, and you have the same PMA bullshit over and over.

"You’re done here, asshole!"

This POS bandage must have failed FDA scrutiny miserably. We never heard a thing about the results. That is why the price is not moving. Simply because everyone at UHP bullshits on the internet instead of developing a real product. Instead of blaming individuals who link factual documents, try placing the blame right where it belongs...on the failed company. You're lucky the price held somewhat steady, at this unrealistically high level, with all the shares dumped.
https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/complaints/2022/comp25413.pdf

"The Bull Shit Detection Rules
No1: Wherever possible there must be INDEPENDENT unbiased confirmation of the “facts.”
That means any research trial published that shows an effect or not needs to be reproduced by another independent party BEFORE we can claim there is or isn’t an effect.

No2: Encourage open honest and substantive debate on the evidence by proponents from ALL sides. This means open, honest, transparent, public debate and discourse is needed by all interested parties regardless of their position or standing, and not only limited to just those with affiliations or connections in closed and private meetings.

No3: Arguments from an authority carry little weight.
Authorities have made mistakes in the past, and they will do so again in the future. There are NO authorities; at most, there are experts, but this still does not make them immune from questioning or challenging.

No4: If there’s something to be explained, think of ALL the different ways in which it could be explained. Think of tests you could do that might systematically DISPROVE the alternatives. What survives among the “multiple hypotheses,” has a much better chance of being the right answer than the first idea that caught your fancy.

No5: Do not to get overly ATTACHED to a hypothesis just because it’s yours.
Ask yourself why you like the idea. Compare it fairly with ALL the alternatives. See if you can find reasons for REJECTING it. If you don’t, others will.

No6: Quantify it.
If whatever it is you’re explaining has some measure, you’ll be much better able to discriminate among competing hypotheses. What is vague and qualitative is open to MANY explanations. Of course there are truths to be sought in qualitative issues, but finding them is more challenging.

No7: Every link in the chain must work (including the premise)
If there is a chain of event or procedures that have to occur to arrive at a result they must all be reproducible, not just most of them. Even if one part of a chain can not be repeated then the result can not be trusted.

No8: Occam’s Razor always applies.
When faced with two hypotheses that explain the data/outcome equally well the SIMPLER one is usually always more correct.

No9: Is the hypothesis FALSIFIABLE?
Ideas and theories that are untestable are not worth much. Others must be given the chance to try and duplicate your experiments to see if they get the same result."

https://www.thesports.physio/the-bull-shit-detection-rules/