RushNet Inc (RSHN)

[JoshTaeger]

I give RSHN...correction...DGI...for publishing this study. To the extent that its main purpose is as a promotion piece for DGI, with less importance for RSHN, is TBD.

The quality of this report for exceeds anything any consultant or "partner" of SHMP has ever published. So that's a milestone right there.

Acknowledging that it is a report of trials, the report needs to be fleshd out. The report says 21,000 PLs initially. Let's ignore the reported and estimated mortality rates and stick with 21K. The mean weight after 100 days was 42g. Again, ignoring mortality, 21K PLs x 42g = 1940lb. Using DGI's estimated mortality of 50%, that's still just shy of 1000lb. Pretty nice, IMO.

The report says that the avg shrimp size was approximately the same for both trials, 42g. What the report doesn't say (unless I missed it), is what the final biomass of the first trial was, i.e., after the initial thinning to reduce O2 demand. So we really don't know, at least I don't know, what the actual improvement was using DGI's tech.

The contribution that DGI's tech makes to the equation is important, as is the cost to RSHN to license DGI's tech. That info would be helpful.

But overall...nice job.