Yes and no, ben. Durrant has gotten FDA approval of many drugs throughout his career, including several that proved to be blockbusters. So I think that demonstrates that he is actually an expert at knowing "what it takes to get a drug approved."
But that also means that regulators can't bullshit him. Yet, that is what they are trying to do. So Durrant knows what he has to do now.
The thing I like about Novavax is that they got regulatory approval from countries all around the world, before trying to get FDA approval in the US. The CEO they had was smart enough to do that, but fell short of managing operations afterwards. So they have a new CEO, and he seems better at managing operations. And I hope they end up partnering with Humanigen, and use lenz as a vaccine enhancement.
But we need lenz approved by a regulator, and I think the UK will finally be the regulator that approves lenz? Why? Because they have to.
My focus lately has been been on the UK's response to reality. I've been showing videos that graphically demonstrate that reality (for my reference, I'm talking about post numbers 42034 and 42035). Still, there is enough video evidence that I've been permitted to show that Humanigen's/Taran's lenz should be used in place of the mRNA vaccines. The proof is incontrovertible.
Not only are doctors/embalmers seeing novel presentations of the deadly blood clots they are finding post-mortem, actuaries and researchers are substantiating the physical evidence with statistical evidence. They are demonstrating multiple findings, such as significant excess deaths, in those patients who had mRNA vaccines.
In Durrant's post (which I still can't find) about Taran's objectives going forward, he didn't specifically mention covid. I hope, however, that's because Humanigen may continue that effort after they recall their loaned shares, and therefore have the funds to proceed.
AI
