InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 101
Posts 13501
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 01/23/2004

Re: Nihil8 post# 37647

Wednesday, 03/06/2024 5:17:19 PM

Wednesday, March 06, 2024 5:17:19 PM

Post# of 38914
Seems to me the tweets were truthful. They engaged Rhonda Keaveney to assist CNNA with F 211 , they negotiated price and ended up not taking on her services.most likely do to her fee.

No where did I see they stated they retained her.

Those investors you cite must have called Rhonda Keaveney pretty quickly, since the first tweet was at 12:16 PM and the second tweet second tweet was at 1:37 PM, making this statement of yours ( " then investors called her and she stated that she had not been retained and the company had to issue a follow up tweet about it did look pretty dishonest tho didnt it?") seems dishonest doesn't it?

Looks to me that they were doing their best to be as honest as possible.

CNNA
@CNNA_OTC
·
Jun 15 12:16 PM
We disagree with the expert market action, but we are engaging Rhonda Keaveney to assist $CNNA with F 211 to get the matter resolved. For those unaware, she is very experienced in custodianships, Form 10's and expert market related matters.


CNNA
@CNNA_OTC
·
Jun 15 1:37 PM
To clarify last tweet, due to calls to Ms. Keaveney, we are awaiting a quote from her to officially retain her services, following several discussions on the matter we believe she is well suited to assist. Regardless, we are proactively addressing the matter to be rectified asap.



Your next example please.