1. Because PWC helped Bioamber develop a restructuring plan that included a dual path in order to maximize value for all stakeholders including finding and securing current operations followed by a SISP process for the sale/long-term financing of the business. THAT PLAN WAS NEVER FILED WITH THE COURT. PWC then went on to say: Other stakeholders included the licensors of the Company's intellectual property, local and international customers, and shareholders 2. Bioamber engaged in operations in Canada and the United States through a series of holding and operating companies. WHY WEREN'T THESE SERIES OF HOLDING AND OPERATING COMPANIES DETAILED IN COURT RECORDS?
Source Material: Technical Bids: Proposal to Public Works and Government Services Canada - Author: PWC - Main contributor: Mica Arlette
So that answers the question you posed and your reason for being here.
IE
P.S.- I think Pirate has a copy of the RESTRUCTURING PLAN in that "confidential" folder on his desktop.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.