InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 152
Posts 39318
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 06/11/2001

Re: None

Friday, 03/01/2024 5:02:18 PM

Friday, March 01, 2024 5:02:18 PM

Post# of 25994
Stokd
10m

$NLST This is good and relevant to our circumstances, affirms our frequent discussion.
*Supreme Court Denies Petition Arguing for Preclusive Effects of PTAB Decisions Pending Appeal*
"Supreme Court denied Liquidia Technologies’ petition for a writ of certiorari to review a precedential Federal Circuit decision. In the petition, Liquidia argued that a PTAB written decision should block liability of infringement in parallel district court litigation, even while pending appeal."
-United sued Liquidia for infringement.
-Liquidia petitioned IPRs.
-PTAB FWD—all claims unpatentable.
-Liquidia submitted FWD in district court.
-Dist Crt declined collateral estoppel—"PTAB decision “does not have collateral estoppel effect until that decision is affirmed.”—"district court also held all claims of the 793 ptnt were not invalid".
-Fed Cir(CAFC) affirmed Dist Crt's finding.
-Liquidia filed writ/certiorari to SCOTUS.
-SCOTUS denied Liquidia’s petition—"Fed Cir holding remains good law".
https://www.ptablitigationblog.com/supreme-court-denies-petition-arguing-for-preclusive-effects-of-ptab-decisions-pending-appeal/
Bullish
Bullish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NLST News