Optec International Inc (OPTI)

[tdbowieknife]

That was a proposed final judgment provided as a convenience for the Judge by the plaintiffs' attorney. Thats done all the time. The Judge can use it, or not. You can see that it was in fact signed by the Judge on July 25th, 2023. The Judge, or the Clerk for the Judge would have been the one to cross out (proposed).

And it's not my website...

Go jump into the nearest river.


And you missed this part

Represented a face mask manufacturer in commercial dispute over the purchaser's failure to pay for masks it purchased. We obtained a pre-judgment writ of attachment against the purchaser on October 26, 2021. And after it granted our motion for terminating sanctions, the Court on July 25, 2023 entered judgment in favor of our client for $3,499,197.51.

Nano Filter, Inc. v. Optec International Inc., San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2021-00019981-CU-BC-NC.



.

Buyer Beware



..