Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

All publicly traded companies are compelled to comment on any information surrounding them (SEC rules), including the sham jury trial.
The old trick of carrying out a Separate Account plan and then, a bunch of mercenaries are hired to complain about what is announced instead, bringing an Implied Contract case, a claim on phony damages (one-day share price drop; Constitutional damages yesterday in the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals with Bhatti, the same claim brought up to the 5th Cir. by the same attorney with the Collins case,...)

These people truly think that they can swap Preferred Stocks for Common Stocks. This is why they are obsessed with stock price manipulation: the lower the common stock price, the more shares they get for their Prfds and thus, more percentage of ownership.
The U.S. courts have been their playground: abuse of court process all across the board.

15 years on, a Guirdo writes that he will start thinking about it.

I have a much better understanding of what you are saying and thinking overall about this.

Everything is set forth in the law and rules and it's only needed basic knowledge in Finance (Dividends, a distribution of Earnings. Etc.), and those crying out loud "We've been robbed!" are part of the conspiracy for stock price manipulation.
Therefore, it's never "what I'm saying", but what is set forth in the law.

Playing the fool isn't an option but an aggravating circumstance when assessing penalties.
One of the rounds of $4.8B in Punitive Damages is against these plotters and the accessories.