InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 6722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: DaJester post# 785241

Tuesday, 02/06/2024 11:18:41 AM

Tuesday, February 06, 2024 11:18:41 AM

Post# of 794765

And what fiduciary duty does Treasury have?



Only one to taxpayers.

That is irrelevant to the AIG and FnF cases, though. Treasury feared that lawsuits against AIG's board brought by the shareholders would delay and complicate the resolution process, so Treasury took "only" a 92% stake to pre-emptively prevent those lawsuits from happening.

Three judges have already ruled that FHFA has no fiduciary duty to shareholders, and FnF's own SEC filings consistently state that the boards of directors have no fiduciary duty to shareholders either. Thus Treasury has no reason to limit the stake it takes in FnF commons to 92%, or any other number, as it did with AIG.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.

Posting about other posters is the last refuge of the incompetent.