InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 6737
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: imbellish post# 784550

Wednesday, 01/31/2024 7:02:04 PM

Wednesday, January 31, 2024 7:02:04 PM

Post# of 797441

Some major precedent set by Delaware today.



Only if it doesn't get overturned on appeal.

Are we entitled to recission due to breach of fiduciary duty?



Doubtful, for three reasons:

1) Three different judges have ruled that FHFA has no fiduciary duty to shareholders, and none have ruled that they do.
2) Any suit against FHFA or Treasury would be moved out of Delaware state courts and into federal court. To get a suit in a Delaware court it would have to be only against Fannie Mae and not FHFA, which would probably be useless given that FHFA has been involved in every decision Fannie has made since conservatorship started. A suit against Freddie couldn't be in Delaware at all.
3) Lamberth specifically disallowed the plaintiffs to present a recission-based damage model in the jury trial because recission is equitable relief barred by 4617(f) in HERA. This isn't binding on any other courts but he is the only one to have ruled on that specific matter.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.

Posting about other posters is the last refuge of the incompetent.