InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 6722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2016

Re: DaJester post# 783182

Monday, 01/22/2024 6:58:06 PM

Monday, January 22, 2024 6:58:06 PM

Post# of 794628

unless someone challenges the conservatorship itself



This would require someone filing a lawsuit who held shares before conservatorship started and has held them until now. Given that no such challenge has occurred (and no, neither the Kelly nor Washington Federal lawsuits actually challenge the conservatorship) I can't see one ever happening in the future.

I based my investment on the likelihood of warrant exercise. I don't think it's right given the return Treasury has reaped, but I'm prepared for that adverse outcome.



So you are completely discounting the possibility of a senior-to-common conversion? That is by far the biggest threat that the legacy common face.

The SPS LP increase for free I don't think is on the same legal footing IMO.



Do you expect that to ever be challenged in court, let alone successfully? I don't, on either count.

That's why this whole conversation about whether or not the letter agreements violating the implied covenant is just an exercise in semantics. You're never going to file your own lawsuit on that front, otherwise you would have done so rather than wondering about it aloud on here. And it doesn't seem likely anyone else will do so given that it has been 3 years since the most recent letter agreement.

Got legal theories no plaintiff has tried? File your own lawsuit or shut up.

Posting about other posters is the last refuge of the incompetent.