Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

A Chevron case in Fanniegate is moot, because the FHFA has upheld the law, regulations and basic Finance with every action, under the Separate Account plan, a plan already carried out with the FHLBanks in 1989 by the same people (Sandra Thompson and DeMarco) and a plan that is rehabilitating FnF, according to Justice Alito's and Judge Willett's interpretation of the Incidental Power as conservator, spun to pursue a conspiracy jointly with the hedge funds and community banks, that happen to be JPS holders as well.

So, it's a case of ethics, since always it'll be very difficult to limit all the functions of a Federal Agency with legislative wording.
You write "take any action authorized by this section, in the best interests of the Agency", and some people think that it's an authorization to steal from private corporations.

Like the Telephone game, judge Sweeney omitted "authorized by this section" (So, she just wrote "take any action"), the 5th Circuit said that "any action authorized by this section" are those actions within its enumerated Powers, without pointing out that one of the Powers is the Rehabilitation of FnF, and the SCOTUS highlighted the "Rehabilitation of FnF" (Power or statutory goal), but omitted that he was interpreting the "authorized by this section". So, a mixture of Sweeney and Willett.

When talking about ethics, it isn't the same those that had the intent to uphold the law, like DeMarco, and others like Sandra Thompson obsessed with breaking the law and basic Finance, and get away with it with the help of the Judiciary.

We stand up for DeMarco.