Good Vibrations Shoes Inc (GVSI)

[logic-commonsense]

So again, is there any benefit in us going back and forth like a ping pong match?? I don't think it's a fair statement to say that because Sharp has delivered exactly ONE reverse merger to the OTC (and that one wasn't a revenue producing company), then there is now a pattern created showing that he is only able to bring non-revenue producing start ups in the future. If he had brought 4 prior ones and they were all start ups, I'd like agree with you strongly. However, given we've seen exactly one in the past, I don't accept that this created an expectation for his future RM's. It's okay if you disagree. You're allowed to and your position isn't ridiculous. I just happen to disagree with you.