Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

Ou! The plaintiff💩Joshua🤪Angel🤡strikes again:

"The SPS are products. This product required publication in the federal register, public notice and rule making, either prior to signing the SPSPA or after a temporary approval for emergency purposes."

The SPS aren't products because a security needs an activity to be considered a product, like their UMBSs.
The SPS were duly authorized to purchase (no purchase to skip the December 2009 deadline on purchases. "LP increase" instead, a Securities Law violation that needs to be settled with us, as all the securities are issued and dated.), after emergency determination to:
(i) provide stability to the financial markets.
(ii) prevent disruptions in the availability of mortgage finance.


Like the Warrant, by the way. No purchase (issued for free) to skip this prerequisite to protect the taxpayer. A guaranty for the repayment of the SPS investment (an obligation in respect of Capital Stock). That is, a collateral. The exercise price of $0.00001ps confirms that it's a collateral. Otherwise barred in the Fee Limitation clause.

This has been explained a hundred times, yet you are here on a mission: deprive everything of its value or meaning, so what is left is a case of "abusive Federal Agency", Chevron case-style. Look below what I do with your "Chevron", Loper and family.
As long as the FHFA upholds the law, a Chevron case in Fanniegate is moot.

The only abuse in the FHFA, refers to:
1- Stock price manipulation with the Separate Account plan, the only plan that upholds the laws, rules and basic finance for the rehabilitation of FnF (Justice Alito's and judge Willett's prerequisite)
2- A conspiracy jointly with the hedge funds in court, to continue the sacking of the enterprises (sale of loans at a deep discount with the debt forgiveness string attached; fire sales of REO inventory; CRTs; etc.); and the assault attempt on their ownership (Common Stocks).

Quit repeating the same lies from time to time, with your more than 20 different aliases on this board, expecting that maybe one isn't debunked that day, thinking that, this way, your lie sticks:
-The SPS are products, already commented.
- NWS, instead of NWS dividend.
- Interests, instead of dividends.
- HERA, instead of FHEFSSA as amended by HERA.
- The exception in the Restriction on Capital Distributions is a refinancing option, instead of SPS repayment with fresh cash (Common Equity increase)
- Chevron, instead of a magnificent case of rulemaking.
We stand up for DeMarco.
Our hero.