Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Ace Trader]

Lambert’s case is different to shares holders claims for illegal takings under the 5th Amendment and taking of private property.

Lamberts case was about the damages of what the government did by introducing the NWS is it was unfair dealing and unjust. Damages only for that case of the NWS.

Fact 1 : A jury of common law abiding citizens found the Government acted in bad faith. So why didn’t SCOTUS ???

Fact : 2 Because SCOTUS under HERA the government was acting within the boundaries of HERA.

Now back on topic!!! ( The actions of the Government)

The actions of the Government on Sept 8th 2008 ! SCOTUS opinion stats what I said! They can do whatever they want as conservator. ( Within the law)

So to lay it out plan and simple for people to my very 1st post today is .

When and if the Government decides to release the GSE it can do whatever it wants (within the law) of HERA which gives the Government a wide range of options!!

Guessing what those options might be is easy. But guessing how our Government releases them no one knows!

But I’ve stated it plenty of times we are dealing with a government that self deals in its best interest!