Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

The "damage" arose from the retention of a security.
These are the exact same words written in the preface of the famous July 20, 2011 Final Rule "for the transparency of the Conservatorships", where the FHFA talks extensively about the payment of Securities Litigation judgments.
Then, the issuer of those securities is the one to pay the claim of breach of "implied contract" (fiction), not the FHFA as you claim:

FHFA doesn’t have money to pay the compensation.

A must read Final Rule that coincided with the day of Time Limitation as Acting Director. So, DeMarco wanted to make sure that this "exit strategy" is binding. A trap set that would uncover that there are other 2 capital distributions, restricted (dividends and today's gifted SPS), when the exceptions kicked off, and a Final Rule also enacted for the 2nd phase of the Separate Account plan for the case when the SPS were fully repaid (CFR 1237.12): a capital distribution (deplete capital) for the recapitalization (build capital), which is only possible in an External Position, plus the current 3rd phase of the Separate Account plan explained below.
This is "Ano" who writes on social media. Always wrong, but not with the 210-day count:

The Constitutional 210-day clock (FVRA) ended on July 20, 2011.

I wonder why this fact was omitted by the judges and the plaintiff in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals with the Rop case, where, yet again, the attorney for Berkowitz, the almighty and omnipresent David Thompson, sought damages for violation of the Appointments Clause. The judge ruled that there was no limit because HERA didn't establish a limit, enabling the 3rd amendment, when it was enabled by the CFR 1237.12 in a Final Rule on the Time Limitation-day, and all future deeds are lawful.
Currently the 3rd phase, SPS increased for free for the recapitalization of FnF, that is, the Common Equity (for the rehabilitation: CET1, C.C., T1) is held in escrow (External Position) through the offset attached to the gifted SPS, pending unwinding this "joke" in the best interests of the FHFA (gifted SPS? C'mon!)

HappyAlways is the pro se plaintiff with his more than 20 different aliases on this board (Rodney, Barron, etc.), always misleading the retail investor. Another plaintiff that covers up the laws and regulations pertaining to FnF.
Filing frivolous lawsuits has consequences and becoming an advisor or sponsor, writing formal documents, too.