IMO Eddie needs to first explain how exactly he came to own/ control this stolen/ "hijacked" ticker. How exactly did that happen? The hijackers went to prison. Eddie had a duty to investigate whether the people offering him a ticker had legal ownership of it. Receipt of stolen goods is still a crime.
IMO the ill-gotten gains of the conspirators was relatively small by comparison. So it's telling that the SEC chose to make such a public example of these scammers.
PDGood insists that the Kilchesly brothers were, in fact, Mark Miller. However, the SEC apparently disagrees as (a) neither is identified by name but rather as "Nominee 1 & 2" and (b) neither has ever apparently been charged with a crime and likely cooperated with prosecutors in the investigation. Therefore it seems Miller engaged in identity theft to advance his crimes. IMO Eddie should be called to testify whether he actually met, communicated and negotiated with "Nominee 1 & 2" in his acquisition of UITA. If he transferred any payment or other consideration (i.e. stocks, notes etc) who received them?
Bearish
Do not buy, sell or make any investment decision based any information or opinion I post. Conduct your own DD.