Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Barron4664]

Lulu’s analysis supports my thesis of using the “continuing claims doctrine” to file legal exaction claims in local district courts across the country under the little tucker act. This would be a lawfare tactic brought about by shareholders that would force the issue especially if different districts in the US rule differently. Lulu’s analysis is the basis for challenging the initial SPSPA agreement because under the continuing claims doctrine the statute of limitations is still ongoing. Look it up before you respond. The Lamberth jury ruling helps. Any claims must avoid the actions of a conservator, stick with violations of Safety and soundness law and charter act by Treasury and FHFA as regulator.