A.I. technology yes but Dr. Dent will need to license from some other company or pay out big time to have a A.I patent Inventor help him. Also there are roughly 100,000 A.I. patents worldwide so it would pay us to license from someone. I say this for many reasons but mainly the time element, Dr. Dents short comings involving patent writing, I didn't say engineering but the wording (enough about this for now). If you license patent usage you are generally not stepping on eggs waiting for all kinds of legals involving other patents crossing over other Inventors or other corporations. At this stage our patent would not be challenged by two other inventors but as our patent sits it must be continued and evolve into another patent to gain greater scope and engineering. This isn't important right now but Dr. Dent must be aware of this. I explained about our patent prior; when the company first said they have a patent pending and I couldn't pull anything other than trademarks over a period of 1.5-2 years I knew he didn't follow through with our patent application. Now that the patent application was filed we could see it, you can dig into the filing aspects and see when Dr. Dent first filed for a provisional that protects you for 1 year but before that year is up you must produce your patent application writings. Dent failed but within 5 days after that provisional was scrapped he started again. When we heard/seen the actual application you are able to dig into the history to see what the USPTO refused in each patent application. It is very important to understand that just because the USPTO gives you a patent the patent owner doesn't know if it will stand a challenge involving PTAB due to patent infringement The USPTO tries to do their best in issuing but the oversight is massive when considering all the technical BS plus the politics. So, this is one reason why Dent should consider paying a license fee to someone who has everything intact rock solid that their patents have stood the time. It is important to have the money when some of these issue in a patent war with someone could take 10 plus years to resolve. I will say though since we know how Dent operates and know of his professional business skills I sense that he would be more than willing to work on resolving any patent issues with other corporations. In other words he isn't a greedy man he just wants to have his own space to present to the world something in the medical world to help many others.
Now do know Dr. Dent picked one of the largest corporation in the world to engineer our patent but some of the wordings, (strike the word cell phone yet the device is a cell phone) might comeback and bite us years down the road but maybe not.
It will be cool to see the next patent application....I also have hope that the company will list to application numbers for some people that like digging into this area.
Take my words lightly but is always straight off the cuff
