InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 92
Posts 10642
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/04/2006

Re: LandPro post# 44736

Thursday, 12/28/2023 11:37:09 AM

Thursday, December 28, 2023 11:37:09 AM

Post# of 46803
No deal will happen in RHODEHAMEL land.

NOT HERE OR AT ANY MARK MILLER TOUCHED OTC CORP.
The Sting was a great movie.

Theyre crooked but not dumb.
6 Mark Millers and 3 Kilcheskys and more 2 come

DOJ and FBI got some issues. GRAND JURY CITY COUNCILMAN
SEC MARK MILLER case in limbo



18 U.S.C. § 3771. Crime victims' rights

(a) RIGHTS OF CRIME VICTIMS.--A crime victim has the following rights:

(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.

(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused.

(3) The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding.

(4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding.


(5) The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case.

(6) The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law.

(7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.

(8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.

(9) The right to be informed in a timely manner of any plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement.


(10) The right to be informed of the rights under this section and the services described in section 503(c) of the Victims' Rights and Restitution Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 10607(c)) and provided contact information for the Office of the Victims' Rights Ombudsman of the Department of Justice.
https://www.justice.gov/usao/resources/crime-victims-rights-ombudsman/victims-rights-act


Careful what ya ask 4
"This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office," Smith said in a filing to the Supreme Court.
https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20231223-us-supreme-court-declines-to-fast-track-trump-s-absolute-immunity-case

The Colorado Supreme Court decision Tuesday is trickier for the justices. The ruling is unprecedented and historical — the first time a presidential candidate has been ruled ineligible for the ballot under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that insurrectionists can’t serve as senators, representatives, presidential electors, “or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State.” Two other state courts have rejected that constitutional argument: Minnesota Supreme Court and Michigan Court of Appeals.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/analysis-trumps-legal-thicket-ensnares-the-supreme-court

The CBS article reports that diverse groups, including the “libertarian Cato Institute, the conservative Americans for Prosperity, and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund,” have joined together to urge the United States Supreme Court to revisit the qualified immunity doctrine. According to CBS, this group wrote in a brief filed with the Supreme Court that, “Qualified immunity denies justice to victims of unconstitutional misconduct [and] … imposes cost prohibitive burdens on civil-rights litigants.”
https://www.police1.com/legal/articles/the-attack-on-the-police-officers-qualified-immunity-defense-sgocV8c2TrJCvFrU/