Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Wise Man]

You are a lawyer, pro se plaintiff Joshua Angel.
It seems that you have difficulties in comprehending written texts.
I'm talking about both the interlocutory appeal by Fairholme and the 11-related cases acting in concert, as judge Sweeney stated in her Opinion being appealed (Watch the screenshot in the tweet attached), that was followed up by Fisher's weird motion to certify interlocutory appeal, with 2 questions that were stolen from Fairholme's 6 controlling questions of law in the interlocutory appeal already submitted, and, secondly, the appeal in the Supreme Court to review the prior appeal, submitted by some of the related cases. For instance, Cacciapalle case now in the Lamberth Court too, and Owl Creek case, submitting the same question posted below, and other petitions where individual plaintiffs within a case filed separately (Andrew T. Barrett and Fairholme)
So, 4 petitions in total as far as I'm concerned.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\22-100.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\22-98.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\22-97.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docket/docketfiles/html/public\22-99.html


All of the above, about a Taking case.
I'm not talking about the appeal in the Supreme Court in the Collins case, years before, that you mention.
Fisher lost his opportunity to file an appeal in the Supreme Court on time, maybe because his questions were already filed by other plaintiffs in related cases. So, he thought that he had lost yet again another opportunity to be in the spotlight and pretend to be a "Fanniegate hero", like our other enemy Glen Bradford that calls himself that.