InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 752
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/10/2018

Re: DaJester post# 778424

Wednesday, 12/20/2023 12:47:26 PM

Wednesday, December 20, 2023 12:47:26 PM

Post# of 795767

Oh boy, here we go again..


Unfortunately

I suggest you read the third paragraph that follows.

Lamberth does not destroy my argument because I'm not saying the NWS is an illegal act. I'm saying FHFA cannot implement it into any agreements because it violates shareholder rights. With your level of attention to detail, I don't know how you are missing this point. You can keep saying the NWS is not illegal until you are blue in the face and you'd be right. That doesn't mean the FHFA can continue to use that language in the contracts moving forward.


Sure they can. Just like they did the first time. Is this a hard concept for you to understand?