Fellow shareholders - please enjoy this preview to an upcoming post with respect to shareholders and naysayers.
Scenario 1:
Shareholders who frequent this forum have done their DD, have a sunk cost as of now, and are only inspired to continue holding due to the volume of naysaying.
Naysayers are trying to shake free some shares by berating the FKA and shareholders alike. When Great-Grandma Smith and Policeman Jones passed away their estates saw holdings with no value attached and had them removed from their accounts but that didn’t add up to the target number needed. They still need more and in a sign of tremendous dedication, continue to hash it out with the same group who vowed to not relinquish their shares - day in and day out of course.
Scenario 2:
Shareholders who frequent this forum have done their DD, have a sunk cost as of now, and are only inspired to continue holding due to the volume of naysaying.
Naysayers are trying to shake free some shares by berating the FKA and shareholders alike. Only in this scenario the shares aren’t to materially improve the situation they are personally in. Rather, they are contracted by another entity to be ever-present and to present as omnipotent. There would be 2 primary shareholder targets in this scenario - I doubt those will be successful endeavors. In the face of failing their primary targets they take aim at all others. Anything they can shake free will save the 3rd party, who must be most unhappy on their ROI.
At any rate, day in and day out, one group says we will not relinquish, and the other says there’s no value in the CUSIP (to be fair they try to avoid that semantically) so we are dumb for holding.
Only time will tell and as always I’m sure thrilled to be a shareholder.
