Health Discovery Corp (HDVY)

[Zenos Arrow]

>>>This is the only hypothesis that makes sense to me, so I am sticking with it until I see compelling evidence to the contrary.>>>

Agreed. And the 2.2 mil would be a loss, not a win, since I don’t think it would even cover expenses.

The only counter argument is: Suddenly, all entities involved realized there were no damages inferred at the closing of the discovery phase. I say inferred, because I believe discovery involves only submissible evidence which will be presented in court. A “discovery surprise” is a contradiction in terms, since evidential transparency is the aim of discovery.

As early as the pre-trial communication, damages were indicated, so it would be hard to imagine going forward that damages weren’t cemented along the way.

Contingency attorneys carefully calculate the risk, and a miscalculation like this would be a My Cousin Vinny (minus Marisa Tomei) level of incompetency. I find it implausible that we can prove infringement without damages.

I’m squarely, and reasonably in the “more to come” camp.