InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 737
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/14/2023

Re: MrNormall post# 155914

Wednesday, 12/06/2023 2:28:39 PM

Wednesday, December 06, 2023 2:28:39 PM

Post# of 171964
Ok - I say this at the risk of knowing I might get some angry responses from the bulls here. And I would hope all here know that I am optimistic about GVSI’s prospects and I’m holding long. However, that being said I kind of disagree with some of your ideas here (not 100% but still I see it differently). All along I’ve posted that I think FINRA is the key to GVSI. I firmly believe that if FINRA does not authorize the name/ticker changes, then it’s curtains for us longs. So, I believe the reason George has filed for the name/ticker changes prior to RM is because the incoming entity would want to see proof of concept that GVSI is truly a clean shell prior to agreeing to a RM. They need to see that reasonable corporate actions are going to be greenlighted for them going forward. If FINRA won’t allow the simple name/ticker changes that George has filed for here due to the Misdeeds of the prior regime, then I can’t imagine the potential incoming company would agree to close the deal because they’d be concerned that FINRA will stop corporate actions for them for the very same reasons in the future.

Just my opinion - not the gospel. And I do think George will get FINRA whatever they need to make it happen. But I disagree that GVSI could just do the RM now without FINRA’s stamp of approval because I don’t think the incoming Company would ever agree to that.