Jon Jon- If their technology had any merit in a clinical scientific environment that mimics the clinical standards of what your claim is, it would then have merit. You can present holy cow results on something but if it's not in the proper environment that passes the acid test, it's worthless!!! The same claim that their petri dishes gave accurate results in 30 minutes, right? Comparing the results to the next best thing as penicillin. It was all BS, otherwise, they would have cornered the Petri dish market. What were the results? That in itself was a total misrepresentation!! Elizabeth Holmes. Or, the big boys would have scooped up their RVA/N-Assay technology and you would all be cashing in your stock for $5 or $10. You can claim holy cow results but if they are not in the right clinical scientific environment (gold standard) in what you claim, the results are irrelevant. Everything I said from the beginning was 1,000 % spot on. I have done the deep dive! And, so is this...their patents don't pass the acid tests in real-world clinical scientific environments. Otherwise, the big boys would be fighting over your technology. They would want that holy cow technology edge over its competitors. That's why it has zero value, the true results don't pass the litmus test. Side note, nobody is going to invest the enormous financial resources it takes to revive anything with this company and nothing technology. Unfortunately, as much as we want to believe in Santa Claus you have to conclude that Santa isn't real!!! Ho Ho Ho.
It's Over!