InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 37
Posts 7018
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/06/2014

Re: Pacjd post# 15431

Monday, 12/04/2023 4:22:27 PM

Monday, December 04, 2023 4:22:27 PM

Post# of 15647
that "royalty interest" you describe is not documented anywhere and it contradicts what GTHP filed with the SEC.

So you're asking me to believe YOU, an anonymous poster on a message board, instead of the legal SEC filings of a publicly traded company.

You see how that would be hard for me to do, right?

I think Shenghou gave up contractual rights simply because they couldn't fulfill their part of the contract. That doesn't entitle them to royalty payments or any other kind of payment.

If Shenghou "found SMI" to keep their GTHP agreement alive, they would sub-contract with SMI and keep dealing with GTHP themselves. That didn't happen. SMI is dealing directly with GTHP. Shenghou is not part of that agreement in any way. At least, that's what the SEC filings say. You want me to believe that GTHP is lying in their SEC filings, and without proof, I am not going believe that.

No point in discussing this further unless you want to match the proof I offered from the SEC filings with contradicting proof that there's a legal agreement between Shenghuo and GTHP stipulating that Shenghuo gets a royalty from SMI payments.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent GTHP News