InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 253528
Next 10
Followers 24
Posts 1614
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: krenjp post# 42407

Friday, 02/23/2007 1:36:27 PM

Friday, February 23, 2007 1:36:27 PM

Post# of 253528
The data mining at INGN is far more egregious than the data mining ALTH did a few years ago. For one thing, ALTH actually ran a pivotal Phase III. They picked the wrong subgroup to try and get approval for, however. The brain mets from breast cancer subgroup comprised approx 25% of the ITT group. At least ALTH is now running a pivotal Phase III w/SPA for that subgroup. Probably a coin flip for stat sig.

In addition, ALTH has not done a reverse split. They've diluted somewhat, but the price is ~3 1/2 times where it was in May 2004 after they got thumbs down at ODAC. INGN's subgroup comprised approx 5-10% of the ITT group in its Phase III. Not only that, but the co is trying to cherry-pick patients from some of its Phase II trials in order to add them all together into a collective group to present to the FDA. The company is a scam, IMO.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.