InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 176024
Next 10
Followers 0
Posts 6
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2023

Re: None

Sunday, 12/03/2023 12:10:38 PM

Sunday, December 03, 2023 12:10:38 PM

Post# of 176024
A frequent poster asked us an age-old question. If a tree falls in the woods and no one hears it does it make a sound? This question intrigued me years ago for about 5 seconds. YES - it does make a sound - if you don't believe it look up the definition of "sound" and apply some common sense.

Let's apply some common sense to VIVOS. What this small company has accomplished is nothing short of a miracle. I won't spend time recapping the significant accomplishments. The fact is this company is on the verge of IDE submission. The FDA's responsibility is to review the benefits and risks of new medical treatments to determine if the potential benefits outweigh the risks.

To me the biggest risk would be genotoxicity - which theoretically can be controlled by the placement and dosage administered to the tumor in question. Many chemotherapy treatments are genotoxic but approved - risk vs reward (?). We all know people who have been ravaged by chemo and ultimately pass (ie Tyler Trent and so many others). I'm very optimistic RDGL will be approved for human trails as we all should be.

Back to our frequent (negative) basher. Private and public equity firms have screen scanners (tools that can read the internet). These tools are programmed (AI) to determine if information is positive or negative. KEY words are searched for and counted - if the negative outnumber the positive AI will flag the subject (company in question) unfavorably and will not recommend investment.

VIVOS - on the verge of IDE submission after extensive testing (with outstanding results) - stringent quality control guidelines, procedures and documentation (FDA reviewed) - intellectual property protection and support from major institutions should be priced much higher.

The objective of our friend is to turn these search engines off - keeping the price unnaturally low for the potential of a bigger return once IDE is submitted (in other words a big buy-in just after IDE submission). I did a little research and found another investment site forum. Guess what - I searched RDGL and who popped up with negative comments. Not the exact same alias but the same key words (bankruptcy - incompetence ...) and frequency of posting.

IF RDGL is not approved it will be an injustice. Continue your support and pass the word on to your friends and family allowing them an opportunity to make their own decision. What our frequent poster has done should result in a permanent ban. But this person is obviously an experienced pro and I would assume is paid to attack many penny stocks on the verge of significant opportunity.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RDGL News