Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[nyt]

As stated, an insider does not have to publicly disclose use of 10b5-1. But if they do so choose to, it must be done via an 8k or a PR. Are you saying she stated as much in a PR? If so, I never saw it. Please indicate yes or no to this. If she did, the purpose would have been to mitigate accusations of illegal insider trading, so if she did do so, it sure didn't work for some reason. Again, that's why beginning months ago, I kept posting that she may have publicly disclosed. I asked certain ppl who I thought would know, for certain, and they ignored the question.

If it was via an 8k, I also missed that. Are you saying it was done that way? If so, what is the date of the 8k?

While I am no friend of vplm, nor have a pro sentiment, I still play fair always and if she disclosed publicly, as you clearly said she did, then I did the right thing all this time trying to make that possibility known. That certainly is not unsmart. And it was with the goals of quelling discontent and disseminating the rules. Nothing wrong with that. So if I made some mistake, it would be more prudent for you to specify the mistake rather than childishly calling me dumb.

If it was disclosed in a PR or an 8k, then the frustrations are unfounded, I would think. If not, then it's still possible the rule was used as disclosure publicly is not required.

All things considered, I think that even if 10b5-1 was used, I still think it was violated and that illegal trades were made.