InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 274
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2005

Re: LocWolf post# 17955

Sunday, 11/19/2023 3:10:29 PM

Sunday, November 19, 2023 3:10:29 PM

Post# of 18331
>>> strike gold here and I'll strangle that leprechaun>>>

I swear I’m going to collect these Loc’isms over the years and submit them in one final post.

I don’t think the number of AI patents is as pertinent as the patents themselves.

As far as the number: I believe the proliferation of AI patents equals “acceptance” within these industries – so that could only be a good indicator, if we actualized Fromholzer’s statement.

As far as the patents themselves: Ours have done well in the clinical diagnostics sector.
Ciphergen/Vermillion/Aspira Labs’ Ova1 (proteomic test) was developed in conjunction with Quest Diagnostics; seemingly minutes after we collected our settlement. Neogenomics’ profited off our patent in its flow cytometry (analyzing large data sets for cancer testing). I often wonder who else in this big-date driven sub-sector of biotechnology.

I can make a case for HDC still commercializing their technology when the patents expire (I offered Myriad’s BRCA genes patent as an example).

We would need a proper, commensurate settlement, along with a company commitment to commercialize our patents. But again, my argument is mostly around the “more to come” regarding our settlement (whatever that might be).

Even the mere mention that this is a scam shows a profound lack of DD, critical thinking skills or honesty.