InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 711
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/31/2018

Re: loophole lawyer post# 125959

Friday, 11/17/2023 5:42:58 PM

Friday, November 17, 2023 5:42:58 PM

Post# of 130929
That was the reason for a comment: "Funny!".

AMZN perhaps did not know about the successful conclusion of the ex parte reexamination certificate.

Another point:
AMZN and APPL went to Fed Cir court challenging to cancel all RBR claims ('815 patent?) moving from NDCal's clueless dist court. Now that the reexamination patent 606 is strengthened with 50+ original claims and added new claims to eliminate Alice "obviousness" arguments, we have a good opportunity to test our new patent in Albright's court. If our arguments win, it will serve as a basis for future Alice challenges in NDCal or other US courts. We only need a single claim to demand infringement damages from AMZN. We have 50+ claims!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News